Tuesday, October 8, 2013

Thoughts On S/D Trading

I was actually writing a reply to a comment I received, and realized that it is better to put it up as a post in case it could be useful to some readers.

I've spent many months trying to understand and trade S/D concepts, and quite honestly have been through the same stage of being overwhelmed, frustrated, and cynical.

If you ask me, I would say the biggest problem is that there are so many ways to trade S/D concepts, and most threads/sites don't have fixed rules, so you might have a rough idea of what an engulf, Quasimodo, compression, bearish engulfing candle is but you don't know when they work and when they don't. So you might see posters who take engulf trades or a bearish engulfing bar and those trades turn out as big winners, but when you try to replicate it you get multiple losses and wonder why. Good thing about AceGazette is, after some time you realize many of these posters only have a 40-50% win rate and their equity curve isn't pretty, which means there is a problem with their trades to begin with. There is no reason to study their trades except to learn from their mistakes. In short, simply taking engulfing bars at any S/D zone will not cut it, taking any engulf or Quasimodo which appears in the middle of no where will not cut it, touch trading a zone just because there is compression leading to it will not cut it.

I realized all that through hundreds of failed trades, and from observation of many other journals. Now this doesn't mean that AceGazette, ReadTheMarket etc are teaching wrong stuff, far from it. But there are many nuances which most traders fail to notice and this makes ALL THE DIFFERENCE. Here are some of them:
  1. It is very very important to trade with the higher time frame trend and respect higher time frame zones. So for etc, suppose we see a M30 bullish engulf. We try to long the source of engulf when price comes back to it and it turns out as a loss. A very common reason for this is because the engulf is into a HTF supply zone, say H4. Or it could be because we're too high in the curve and the profit margin for longs is no longer there. I've done this dozens of times and seen many people do it too, it is probably the most common reason why engulf trades fail. 
  2. Quasimodos are powerful, but I realized they have to be taken at a HTF zone and not in the middle of no where. So for etc we want to long a M30 Quasimodo in a H4 demand zone, not when it is dangling in the middle of no where.
  3. Compression can last longer than expected. Just look at the AUDNZD pair, compression is everywhere and many times it is not filled. Compression works best after an engulf (Can can pattern), or if price is compressing up to an extreme and high quality zone. Do not touch trade a zone just because price is compressing to it. Sometimes we see a M30 demand zone and ecstatically buy it because we see price compressing down to it, but we fail to notice that the zone is weak, and there is a much stronger H4 extreme zone underneath which will act as a magnet to pull price to it. 
There are so many such nuances, and the sad thing about AG and RTM is that many of the pioneers/seniors are no longer that active. The legendary and genuinely good traders often post without explaining the reasons for trade (Julexo, Ken etc), and those that do explain are mostly enthusiastic newcomers. Much of their trades and analysis are wrong (the dangerous thing is these sometimes end up as winners giving the impression that it is right), but few of those posts are corrected by the seniors. There is no one to blame, because the forums are free so the seniors have no obligation to correct the young traders, and most people are more interested in trading than teaching. 

So in conclusion, I really believe the methodology of the various sites is good, but you need to have a lot of practice, really understand all the nuances in order to make it work. Once you really understand the markets, you'll realize why some zones are touch trade worthy and why it is safer to wait for PA on others. I'm still far far from being good at S/D trading, but I've managed to eliminate many recurring mistakes in the past few months. It really takes months and probably years of chart time and experience.

As for reliable sources to study S/D, here are some:
  1. PriceIsEverything FF thread. Redsword is the man who started it all. Ifmyante, Ken and many others all spawned from this thread. Here is a man who dares to post before the fact, explains his trades, and is consistently and uncannily accurate. A new reader might not be understand the first few pages, but keep reading and after 100 pages or so, you'll notice some recurring patterns (whipsaw engulfing, pins at zones etc). Coincidentally I'm planning to hardcore study the thread from today onwards, with the aim of completing all 1400+ pages of it.
  2. Alfonso's FF thread. Again here is a trader who posts before the fact, is able to explain his trades, and has consistently good results. He has managed to come up with a rule based S/D system, and to be honest it is my bread and butter for now. I'm very active on this thread because after months of filtering and deriving my own rules, I somehow ended up with very similar rules as him so I really agree with his methodology. It is actually nothing new, but his rules help filter most of the mistakes that many RTM and Sam Seiden traders make. I know because I have made those same mistakes hundreds of times.
  3. Lovejoy's FF thread and his website. Also check out Balhana's posts on that FF thread, he is really good and his posts are full of explanations that make sense. Lovejoy has some fantastic videos, in my opinion must watch videos for any aspiring S/D trader. 
At the end of it all, I feel it is very important to decide on a certain style (touch trade or trade PA bars) and focus on it. It is very very difficult to try to learn multiple styles at once, so master one before starting on another. I have one account for touch touching (which I've tested and am confident in), and another demo account to practice trading PA patterns and bars. Pen down trading rules and strictly adhere to them. Journal every trade and study them from time to time. It is amazing how often recurring mistakes occur, and we'll be oblivious to them unless we journal our trades. 

Hope this post helps!

18 comments:

  1. Hi Myst,

    Thanks very much for your excellent post. I do believe redsword PIE thread as great source for scalpers.
    But somehow julexo identify zones correctly but those zones are invalid according to sam seidens SD theory.Post without explanation is not for a good reason. I don't call him legendary. Legendary trader redsowrd says traders help traders.
    When sam seiden trade, he never mention about trend. I also think we have to stick to the trend.

    Guess what , i also will re read PIE thread. We can master these markets only with him. Others just bullshit.

    Rishi

    ReplyDelete
  2. Ya indeed the differences in the kind of zones Sam and the other S/D traders choose puzzled me for a long time. Sam likes those 3-6 candles zones with strong departure, whilst I see many other traders taking crappy zones which still worked out. I might not be correct, but I believe the answer lies in PA. Basically, how is PA as it is approaching the zone. So for etc we might have a crappy/un Seiden like (poor departure, wicky etc) demand zone, but if this zone led to an engulf of a supply zone, and price is compressing back down to it, the experienced traders might venture a low risk long even though the zone is of poor quality. They also look for confluence of trend lines, fibs, divergence, correlation across various pairs, these are things that sometimes are not apparent on charts.

    I feel that Julexo is for real because he does post before the fact in his FF thread, at least in the earlier posts. He also has multiple account statements in AG where he multiplied accounts, not with a handful of overleveraged lucky trades but hundreds of trades with very high accuracy (80-90+% if I didn't remember wrongly). But ya it is hard to learn from him because he doesn't post explanations on most of his charts, which is why I think PIE is still a better source. Hope we're both able to learn much from PIE!

    ReplyDelete
  3. Hi Mystz,

    I followed redsword and doubled my account in one week. But after losing one trade, my account was reduced by 50%(still 50% profit). This is because redsword type trading needs wide stop losses. After that loss i was looking for some accurate low risk type SD trading.Thats where i think i made the mistake. Readthemarket is good. But engulfing of demand or supply as a signal is rubbish i think.As for now it dint work for me. Am i doing something wrong i dont know. This engulfing and flag limit and FTR thing has to debated . What is your opinion?.

    RTM traders explain every trades after it start to move positively. Thats where i suspect their honesty

    ReplyDelete
  4. Wow that is some result! I know what you mean, RTM and IF's videos are good at explaining WHY price turned. So we often see many to the pip explanations, even on M1 chart. I do not have a shadow of doubt that price almost always turn at either a S/D zone or an ignored S/D zone, the problem is, WHICH ONE? And engulfs are everywhere, many of them fail, so which is the right one? It is easy to scroll backwards on a M1 chart and explain every turn (I believe you and I can do that), but trading real time is a totally different thing. I still am unable to figure out how IF trades the M1 chart with such precise accuracy, and whether the senior traders of RTM are really profitable (we'll never know because most don't post before the fact, and there is no transparency of account statements).

    What I do know is that Engulfs, Quasimodos, compression etc do work, however they must be at the right location. A light bulb came on when I studied Alfonso's thread, his way of trading engulfs (he doesn't use this term though) make the most sense. Basically, we need price to arrive at a HTF zone and then start engulfing LTF zones. This works UNTIL we hit another HTF opposing zone. This may sound basic but I've seen so many traders (myself included) commit the mistake of either taking an engulf trade when price is not at a HTF zone, or taking an engulf trade when price has already hit a HTF opposing zone. Some nuances:

    -The lower the time frame, the lower the accuracy. I am doing this on H1 and above for now.
    -Engulf trades blow in a sideways market because what most people perceive to be an engulf is often just a fakeout
    -Always check all time frames. Sometimes we may get say a M15 supply zone that appears to have engulfed down, but this zone is actually part of a larger H4 supply zone. In this case we really want to put our stop beyond the entire H4 zone instead of the M15 zone. This is a little hard to explain..

    I'm still learning and will slowly drop down time frames once I gain consistency on H1 and above. Anyway, if Redsword works for you, why not just focus on it? Those results are really good and if you can do that consistently, you'll be killing the markets! :)

    ReplyDelete
  5. Interesting article.

    Firstly thanks for the recommendation.

    Personally I think the whole SD + PA thing has been over complicated in recent times.

    1. Supply and Demand zones.

    All you need to know is how to identify SD zones and their associated decision points on a chart.

    If you want to touch trade them (FTB style) then you need to know what constitutes a tradable zone (for me substance and clear DP edges) and the associated PA (strong breakout, arc like move away, non-impulsive retrace etc).

    There is nothing more to SD zones than the above.

    2. Price Action

    Of course not all SD zones can be touch traded in the FTB vein, but it doesn't mean we can't find trades off these zones, it means we need more 'information'.

    The problem IMO with traders looking to learn what constitutes tradable PA off a zone is that many approach PA trading with the wrong mindset. The average trader thinks too mechanically hence why pattern trading is so popular - search for a recurring visual pattern (be it a price pattern or bar pattern), develop some loose rules and look to trade it.

    The problem with that approach is that at the end of the day many people that trade like that have a low expectancy (often negative) because they lack the ability to objectively distinguish between a pattern occurring one time and the next. This for me all boils down to a lack of actual price action knowledge. The way I look at patterns if they are visual representation of underlying price action, it's the price action that is important and not the pattern - hence why I don't trade patterns, I trade price action - for me bar and price patterns aren't true price action unless you understand the underlying theory - otherwise you don't know how to distinguish between different occurrences of the same pattern (and most of the time it leads to subjective rather than objective analysis).

    Trying to compartmentalise PA trading into different patterns / categories is having a mechanical mindset. True PA trading for me is about looking at price across various TF’s to obtain information and pooling it together to reach trading decisions – not trying to split between CP trades, Qm trades, Engulf trades. If you can get to the stage when you can do the former you’ll realise that you never need a ‘pattern’ again.

    Lastly, regarding TF’s. For me the way to think of TF’s is not that one TF is more important than the other...different TF’s provide different information (just like zooming into a HTF SD zone provides information on the ‘real’ SD structure i.e. decision points) and different classes of market participants make decisions on different TF’s. No one TF is better or worse it’s just information at the end of the day and the more useful information you can obtain the better.

    This brings me to my final point – most PA trading I see involving PA seems to revolve around this new silly trend of touch trading any old zone or taking a trade after any old rejection / engulf resulting in low win rate but good R trades. For me this isn’t real PA trading either – a good PA trader should be right a lot more than they are wrong i.e. in reading price. For me I’m always looking to answer 1. Where is price heading 2. How should it move there 3. Where should the move commence from – for me that’s the most important series of questions for every PA trade.

    From what I’ve seen most focus on (1) only and thus use wider stops and take many losses trying to trade the move. The power with PA trading is when you can answer all 3 as a) you can then find accurate entries and thus tight stops, b) you can identify trades that should move with momentum and c) you have the good R with the HTF target...Good win rate, good average R and good trade frequency is what a true PA trader should be able to achieve.

    Anyway that’s my views on the subject matter – ping me an email via my site (or connect on Skype – thetradersguild) if you want to discuss further.

    Regards
    Mark

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Hi Mark,

      Thank you so much for taking the time and effort to share your valuable insights as an experienced trader. Your points contain tremendous wisdom, and I'm not saying that for the sake of being polite. Those are some of the best advice I've seen in a while, my heart leapt at many of the things you said because I so agree with them. It got me doing a lot of reflection and thinking for the good part of the night, and I have so much to say. I plan to re read your comments a few more times, and I'll write to you again once I'm able to crystallize my thoughts. And yes I would love to connect and discuss with you further on Skype, thanks for offering!

      Delete
  6. Hi Mark,

    I totally agree with you on this topic. I have been reading your FF thread and watching few videos. They are great. Here myst has been doing wonderful thing. He is the one who introduced thread like your one and RTM or tradersguide (great job you are doing there). There is some saying in Hinduism, to get the truth you need to negate the maya( illusions). In that context i am thinking what is the order flow dynamics behind the engulfing zones, FTR, Flag limit(RTM stuffs). Many things are not clear. Also sam seiden never explain why in the world all institutiions buying and selling at the same level. IT is impossible. If this is possible, then there might be a secret society like freemasons plaaning and excuting in a orderto screw retail trader(just kidding).

    If institutions use bigger time frames, who is buying and selling in the smaller time frame that leave the SD traces.

    Rgards
    Rishi

    ReplyDelete
  7. Hi Myst and mark ,

    Let me know if i also can join the parade.

    ReplyDelete
  8. Hey Myst1z, I am in the same private forum as you are(Alfonso), don't know where else to post this, have you noticed that a lot of SD trading and VSA which I know you've studied is all one way or another similar to YTC's approach to the markets?
    We've talked before on a few of your other posts on your blog, we've have taken some of the same courses, that being Capre, VSA, Lori, etc.
    I just wanted to start a brief discussion on this as I read more and more of Alfonso's stuff and studying VSA, I keep seeing more and more elements of YTC except his stuff(YTC) has very structured rules.

    What are your thoughts on this?

    ReplyDelete
  9. Hey Victor C, Myst1Z,

    I've been studying VSA for quite some time, and when incorporating it into supply and demand i have been noticing some similarities. For example...

    At a demand zone, one would expect to see stopping volume, then a bit of distribution, and then a breakout of the trading range. Is this then the engulf that is so widely hyped? The low volume retest then gives a probable entry. I usually went along until I found signs of accumulation at an opposite zone and then exited.

    VSA /Wyckoff concepts are found in many trading systems being marketed today. Personally I've never checked out YTC stuff, so I can't say much about it.

    I would love to hear your thoughts about VSA and other styles of trading.

    ReplyDelete
  10. Hi Jerry, thanks for replying, sorry to take up your blog space Myst, figured you wouldn't mind the discussion.

    I am studying VSA and Wyckoff right now. I'm getting trained by Tradeguider themselves. I'm also in Alfonso's private forum with Myst, I'm trying to blend the two methods together but have yet to learn SD trading as well as I know VSA.

    I do see what you're saying though, essentially those zones (HTF Curves) are the areas to be watched as price does move from zone to zone, PA is supposed to give us clues as to the likelihood of where price is to go.
    YTC seems to blend this very well together, by paying attention to what happens when price gets to the zone. With Alfonso, he does sometimes use set and forget meaning you put a limit entry at a zone expecting a bounce(with probabilities). With YTC he waits for price to get there and watches the PA to decide if he should fade, wait for BOPB or do nothing.

    Very interesting indeed. Curious to see Myst's comments on this as I know he's studied all of what I've mentioned.

    Also, I like Chris Lori's style as well, he does look at liquidity gaps and fx flows. He doesn't talk about this much on his complete fx course, but I think he does on his monthly PTC club. Not a member. Right now I'm only focused on Alfonso style trading and VSA.

    ReplyDelete
  11. Hi Victor and Jerry,

    First of all I must mention that I do not have good knowledge about YTC and Chris Lori, as it was more of a touch and go without any deep practice of their strategies at all. I don't recall any mentioning of SD zones in YTC, so can't really comment when you said there were similarities with Alfonso. My recollection of YTC is stuff like breakout, breakout pull back, false break, complex pull back etc, but it wasn't with relation to SD zones. Perhaps I overlooked it :P

    As for VSA, this was a major question that I had to come to terms with some time ago. Trading is all about getting an edge. In recent weeks I was exposed to a whole new realm and level of pure PA trading, and I realized there is so much to price reading than I used to know. I really believe that it is possible to read price really well. At that level, one really has to ask himself, will VSA increase his edge? If you're already able to take trades that moves with momentum very quickly with very little draw down, to pinpoint your entries, SLs, and TPs using the M1 chart, to have a very decent hit rate and R per trade, does VSA really improve your edge and give you a better performance?

    I can't answer that question and maybe there isn't a correct answer, but for me I don't think VSA will improve my edge. If I'm not wrong there are two guys on FF who use VSA with SD pretty successfully - HiddenGap and TraderInSD, can check them out if you're interested.

    Actually Mark's comments above is really really wise, I strongly recommend reading it a few times as it totally describes the flawed state of SD trading in many circles. Especially the last part where he said many SD traders nowadays know where price is going but not how it is going there or where the move should commence from. Right now I'm just trying to discard all the inferior things I've learned in the past and focus on pure price reading.

    ReplyDelete
  12. Hey Myst, thanks for the reply. The way I see YTC in one aspect similar to SD trading(and probably the only way) is he uses fresh S/R areas to analyze the PA and decides what to do from there once price reaches it and reacts to it. Don't know if you care to, because I understand you have your own stuff to focus on, however, you'll notice Lance always draws his S/R lines where we would consider it fresh, meaning price turned there and hasn't come back to it yet. Then he uses PA to decide what to do.

    I understand your point on VSA, why add something if without it I can do just as well if not better, why add more that doesn't add to my existing substance or edge. I personally think if I master VSA/Wyckoff, it can do for me what nothing else can. But I will not use it on it's own.

    With FX, I think understanding how to read order flow is important(I personally include SD here as one way). With futures, I'm interested in market/volume profile, footprint charts and time and sales/DOM.
    But again I'm taking my time(may not try learning these for many years), first step is profitability. I'm taking Mark's course in a few weeks from now. I emailed him already inquiring about his course, looking forward to it as I'm trying to demystify this SD trading, I'm starting to understand it, but still a ways to go.

    I agree with you and Mark, on how many SD traders know where price will go but not how it will get there, it seems from FF and RTM that many had that flaw, at least from my interpretation. I'm with you on focusing pure price reading, I think Mark's course will help with that.

    ReplyDelete
  13. I am overwhelmed by your post with such a nice topic. Usually I visit your blogs and get updated through the information you include but today’s blog would be the most appreciable. Well done! custom lapel pins

    ReplyDelete
  14. I like viewing web sites which comprehend the price of delivering the excellent useful resource free of charge. I truly adored reading your posting. Thank you! office removals

    ReplyDelete
  15. I would recommend my profile is important to me, I invite you to discuss this topic... Reversirol Review

    ReplyDelete
  16. I see some amazingly important and kept up to length of your strength searching for in your on the site 相親

    ReplyDelete
  17. Good to become visiting your weblog again, it has been months for me. Nicely this article that i've been waited for so long. I will need this post to total my assignment in the college, and it has exact same topic together with your write-up. Thanks, good share. krypto app referral code

    ReplyDelete